im only at a minute 05, allready i can tell this is going to be emotional,
government must first keep the people and the property safe,
and it has to balance the constitution,
so i think talking about doing harm to people or property is not protected speech, but talking about how one doesnt like our government *is* protected speech,
i know the quote those who give up privacy for security deserve neither,
i think government domestic spying programs like wiretapping are probably extra constitutional, that said, if its a program that protects the identity of the sender, and a computer reviews, and uncovers a plot and a human reviews it and says yeah its not a joke its a real threat, and there is a legislative review, a warrant, and the rule of law followed, im for it,
im going to finish this now
thanks for posting i'll be back to comment im sure